In terms of personality traits, which one does the 16 Personality questionnaire NOT measure?

Prepare for the Board Certified Coaching Exam with our interactive quizzes. Study using flashcards and multiple choice questions, each offering hints and explanations. Start your journey to become a certified coach!

The 16 Personality questionnaire, developed from the theory of personality by Isabel Briggs Myers and Katharine Cook Briggs, primarily focuses on identifying an individual's personality traits based on Carl Jung's psychological types. This assessment includes categories such as introversion/extroversion, sensing/intuition, thinking/feeling, and judging/perceiving.

Among the given options, risk-taking is not a trait that is directly measured by the 16 Personality questionnaire. Instead, traits like tension, emotional stability, and rule-consciousness are all aspects that the questionnaire can effectively evaluate. For example, emotional stability aligns with the assessment of how individuals manage their emotions and stress, while tension can relate to how much anxiety a person typically experiences. Rule-consciousness pertains to how much importance individuals place on rules and structure in their behavior.

In contrast, risk-taking is more commonly associated with behavioral and situational assessments rather than being a stable personality trait identified in this particular personality framework. Thus, the correct answer reflects the focus of the 16 Personality questionnaire on core personality dimensions rather than on behaviors related to risk-taking.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy